The
World today is very different than that which existed when my
ancestors John Eustice and his wife Ann Jewison- newly arrived
and undocumented immigrants from Ireland and England- settled a
few miles from here at Janesville on the shores of Lake Elysian
exactly 140 years ago.
We live very differently today. Lets
look at some of the factors that make our lives in 2008
healthier, more convenient, and more connected with the world
around us than it was in 1868 when John and Annie were settling
in….
I believe three things have had the
most dramatic effects on our lives;
1.
Communication
2.
Globalization
3.
Science & Technology
Communication:
In 1868
communication was difficult. Mail service was sporadic at best.
Letters took weeks to arrive, if at all. In 1903, John Eustis
sent a letter from Janesville to his cousin in Schuylerville,
New York asking how his Aunt Bridget was. He was quite surprised
to learn she had died 50 years earlier. Not much communication
to say the least.
The
railroad arrived in Janesville in 1869. It would be another 40
years before automobiles were available; and then only to the
wealthy. Telephones were invented during the 1870s but did not
become common in rural areas until the 1930s and 40s.
In 2008,
we can connect within seconds with anyone anywhere in the World
by telephone and the internet. Nearly everyone has a computer
and a search on Google can provide information (correct or
incorrect) on any topic.
By using
satellite images available on an internet search engine called
Google Earth, anyone, anywhere can take a relatively detailed
peek at your farm, ranch or place of business. Communication has
brought many improvements to our lives but along with it comes
the very real possibility that what goes on at our place of
business could be the lead story on the Ten O’clock news. If you
don’t believe that, just ask the folks at the Hallmark meat
packing plant in Chino, California. The USDA shut them down
within hours after video images showing animal abuse taken by an
animal rights activist appeared on national television.
We live
in a fast-paced, highly globalized world.
Globalization:
Science & Technology:
In 1870,
the average Caucasian in the US could expect to live about 40
years. The leading cause of death in the US was “consumption”
which was the word used at the time for Tuberculosis, a disease
often caused by drinking milk from or contact with TB infected
cows. Today life expectancy has nearly doubled to about 76 years
for men and over 80 years for women. Technologies such as
pasteurization of milk, immunization against disease and
chlorination of our water supply have made the difference.
Each of
these technologies faced strong opposition when first
introduced;
·
Pasteurization opponents said it wouldn't
prevent disease, the taste was unpalatable, and it was an excuse
for farmers to run a dirty operation. None of these doomsday
predictions turned out to be true. Today, most people would not
consider drinking un-pasteurized (raw) milk because of the known
risks.
Louis Pasteur discovered the process of
“pasteurization” during the 1860s and died in 1895. It was not
until 1949 that the state of Minnesota required that all milk be
pasteurized.
·
When vaccination was introduced into UK
public policy, and adoption followed overseas, there was
opposition from both Protestant and Catholic churches. For
example, Timothy Dwight, a Congregationalist minister and Yale
university president, held that vaccination thwarted God's will,
saying: “If God had decreed from all eternity that a certain
person should die of smallpox, it would be a frightful sin to
avoid and annul that decree by the trick of vaccination”.
Several Boston clergymen and devout
physicians formed the Anti-vaccination Society in 1798, only two
years after Dr. Edward Jenner's publication of smallpox
vaccination. Others complained that the practice was dangerous,
going so far as to demand that doctors who carried out these
procedures be tried for attempted murder.
·
Chlorination opponents continue to claim
that the process produces carcinogenic compounds and must be
stopped. The fact is that nobody has ever died from chlorinated
water while dirty water infested with bacteria is killing
millions of children.
Among a
multitude of other tasks as executive director of the Minnesota
Beef Council, I have worked hard during the past decade to
educate beef producers, consumers and food company officials
about the benefits of food irradiation. To the scientific
community and health experts the idea of food irradiation is a “no
brainer.” Plain and simple - irradiation can do for ground
beef what pasteurization did for milk. Irradiation is the most
extensively studied food processing technology in the history of
humankind. There is no “down side.” The Centers for Disease
Control (CDC) says thousands of cases of serious food borne
illness would be prevented and dozens of lives saved each year
if food irradiation was a routine practice in ground beef and
poultry processing plants.
In 2007,
more than 33 million pounds of E. coli contaminated ground beef
were recalled. It was the second worst year in history for
ground beef recalls. Ground beef containing deadly pathogens
went to kitchens, hospitals and restaurants all over this
country. Most of the recalled ground beef was consumed by the
consumer weeks before the USDA announced voluntary product
recalls. Shocking!
Today
approximately 15 million pounds of ground beef are irradiated
annually, about the same amount that was irradiated in 2002.
What’s holding us back? Why are we allowing children to suffer
and die when food borne illness is easily preventable?
The
arguments raised against irradiation are almost exactly the same
as those voiced by critics of pasteurization many decades ago.
Critics say it compromises quality and is an excuse for
processors to run a dirty operation. They said the same thing
about milk pasteurization- Irradiated ground beef is just as
nutritious and delicious as non-irradiated ground beef.
Schwan’s, Omaha Steaks and others have irradiated all their
ground beef for nearly a decade.
If
you find a path with no obstacles, it probably doesn't lead
anywhere.
|